BTC $64,754.44 +0.67%
ETH $1,917.93 -0.00%
BNB $593.97 +4.02%
XRP $1.09 +0.52%
SOL $74.70 +0.99%
TRX $0.3287 +0.94%
DOGE $0.0707 +0.04%
ADA $0.1718 +3.38%
BCH $219.49 +3.73%
LINK $8.49 +1.22%
HYPE $54.74 -0.46%
AAVE $99.71 -0.46%
SUI $0.7047 +1.76%
XLM $0.1724 -0.46%
ZEC $472.59 +0.53%
BTC $64,754.44 +0.67%
ETH $1,917.93 -0.00%
BNB $593.97 +4.02%
XRP $1.09 +0.52%
SOL $74.70 +0.99%
TRX $0.3287 +0.94%
DOGE $0.0707 +0.04%
ADA $0.1718 +3.38%
BCH $219.49 +3.73%
LINK $8.49 +1.22%
HYPE $54.74 -0.46%
AAVE $99.71 -0.46%
SUI $0.7047 +1.76%
XLM $0.1724 -0.46%
ZEC $472.59 +0.53%

Cosine: The large asset security management model needs a major upgrade, and details on why the Safe front-end was tampered with still need to be disclosed

2025-02-27 00:48:56
Collection

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist Yu Xian posted on platform X stating that Safe has ultimately been breached. The smart contract part is indeed fine (easily verifiable on-chain), but the front end was tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect.

As for why it was tampered with, we will wait for the official details from Safe. Safe can be considered a type of security infrastructure; theoretically, anyone using this multi-signature wallet could be stolen from, similar to Bybit. All other services with front ends, APIs, and user interaction may carry this risk as well. This is also a classic supply chain attack, and the security management model for large/huge assets needs a significant upgrade.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.