BTC $64,765.25 +0.99%
ETH $1,922.50 +1.15%
BNB $585.55 +3.02%
XRP $1.08 +0.51%
SOL $74.26 +1.09%
TRX $0.3284 +0.51%
DOGE $0.0700 -0.58%
ADA $0.1656 +1.37%
BCH $211.53 +0.28%
LINK $8.44 +1.42%
HYPE $53.03 -3.70%
AAVE $98.89 +0.85%
SUI $0.6913 +0.70%
XLM $0.1723 -0.95%
ZEC $475.24 +3.33%
BTC $64,765.25 +0.99%
ETH $1,922.50 +1.15%
BNB $585.55 +3.02%
XRP $1.08 +0.51%
SOL $74.26 +1.09%
TRX $0.3284 +0.51%
DOGE $0.0700 -0.58%
ADA $0.1656 +1.37%
BCH $211.53 +0.28%
LINK $8.44 +1.42%
HYPE $53.03 -3.70%
AAVE $98.89 +0.85%
SUI $0.6913 +0.70%
XLM $0.1723 -0.95%
ZEC $475.24 +3.33%
first_img

CFTC acknowledges that it should not sue Gemini and jointly requests the court to withdraw the consent order

2026-05-28 10:12:12
Collection

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced on Tuesday that it has jointly filed a motion with Gemini Trust Company LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, requesting the dismissal of a previous judgment against Gemini.

The case was originally filed in June 2022, and the parties reached a consent order in January 2025. After a comprehensive review, the CFTC concluded that the lawsuit should not have been filed and would not be filed under current enforcement standards.

The review identified six major issues: the complaint was primarily based on statements from a whistleblower of questionable credibility; the investigation targeted Gemini as a victim of fraud rather than the alleged fraudster; there were serious doubts about the strength of the evidence against Gemini; relevant supporting materials were concealed and not submitted to the commissioners during the CFTC's vote on the complaint; the litigation team invoked deliberative process privilege to prevent Gemini from obtaining evidence necessary for its defense; and personnel improperly used CFTC regulatory power to create leverage for settlement.

The CFTC determined that continuing to enforce the forward-looking provisions of the consent order is neither consistent with its mission nor in the public interest, and that the non-forward-looking provisions of the consent order (such as civil penalties) have been fulfilled. The parties jointly request the court to vacate the remaining forward-looking provisions.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.