BTC $80,084.10 -1.62%
ETH $2,317.94 -2.16%
BNB $747.69 -0.47%
XRP $1.29 -3.00%
SOL $100.10 -2.51%
TRX $0.3312 -0.12%
DOGE $0.0781 -2.86%
ADA $0.1994 -3.88%
BCH $279.20 -7.67%
LINK $11.48 -3.08%
HYPE $79.17 -3.58%
AAVE $130.75 -3.48%
SUI $0.9127 -3.17%
XLM $0.1684 -1.99%
ZEC $1,248.32 -5.32%
AAPL $348.18 +0.56%
AMZN $252.34 -0.72%
GOOGL $292.51 -10.29%
MSFT $548.29 +3.22%
META $621.50 -0.35%
NVDA $214.16 -2.52%
TSLA $402.31 -1.81%
SNDK $1,357.82 -0.20%
INTC $91.79 -3.65%
SPCX $144.13 -3.81%
MU $949.94 -1.43%
AMD $562.33 -1.09%
BTC $80,084.10 -1.62%
ETH $2,317.94 -2.16%
BNB $747.69 -0.47%
XRP $1.29 -3.00%
SOL $100.10 -2.51%
TRX $0.3312 -0.12%
DOGE $0.0781 -2.86%
ADA $0.1994 -3.88%
BCH $279.20 -7.67%
LINK $11.48 -3.08%
HYPE $79.17 -3.58%
AAVE $130.75 -3.48%
SUI $0.9127 -3.17%
XLM $0.1684 -1.99%
ZEC $1,248.32 -5.32%
AAPL $348.18 +0.56%
AMZN $252.34 -0.72%
GOOGL $292.51 -10.29%
MSFT $548.29 +3.22%
META $621.50 -0.35%
NVDA $214.16 -2.52%
TSLA $402.31 -1.81%
SNDK $1,357.82 -0.20%
INTC $91.79 -3.65%
SPCX $144.13 -3.81%
MU $949.94 -1.43%
AMD $562.33 -1.09%

mining

All
Article
Flash

first_img Heatbit launched the $899 Bitwater component, heating water while mining Bitcoin

Heatbit, which previously launched a heater with a built-in Bitcoin mining machine, has announced the release of a heating element for water heaters named Bitwater. This element replaces the resistance wire in standard electric water heater elements with 20 Bitcoin mining chips, using the heat generated by the chips to directly heat the water in the tank. Heatbit stated that this electricity was originally intended for heating water, "the same heat, the same electricity, plus Bitcoin." The company claims that global households use approximately 300 TWh of electricity annually for heating water, which exceeds the entire Bitcoin network's consumption of about 170 TWh, advocating for the decentralization of mining to households.Bitwater uses 20 Bitmain BM1370 chips, with a maximum hash rate of 34 TH/s, a maximum power consumption of 600 watts, and an energy efficiency of 12 joules/TH. Due to water cooling, this element requires no fans and produces no noise. The installation process is DIY: turn off the circuit breaker, drain the tank, unscrew the old element, and then screw in the Bitwater using the included wrench. It is compatible with the one-inch standard interface of 30 to 80-gallon electric water heaters commonly found in the United States and Canada, including brands such as A. O. Smith, Rheem, Bradford White, Whirlpool, and GE, without the need for plumbing modifications or additional circuits.Users can check water temperature, hash rate, and earnings through an app, and choose to mine individually or join a mining pool, with mined Bitcoin sent to an address controlled by the user. The initial "genesis batch" pre-order price is $899, with subsequent batches priced up to $1,299, and pre-orders are refundable, with plans to ship in the first quarter of 2027. Heatbit claims to have tested the entire winter in four and five-person households in New York and Florida. Based on the current hash price of approximately $36.73/PH/s/day, the full load of 34 TH/s could mine Bitcoin worth about $1.25 per day, totaling approximately $455 annually.

Vitalik compared the mining costs of BTC and the inference costs of AI: the former has electricity costs accounting for nearly half, while the latter relies more on capital expenditures for computing power

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin shared that the cost of Bitcoin mining is roughly half derived from capital expenditures on computing power equipment and the other half from electricity consumption; in contrast, the cost of AI inference is almost entirely dominated by capital expenditures on computing power. This difference reflects the distinct cost structures of the two computing businesses. Bitcoin miners need to continuously pay for electricity and determine their profit margins based on mining machine efficiency, coin prices, and network difficulty changes; AI inference, on the other hand, relies more on investments in expensive hardware like GPUs, as well as equipment utilization and computing efficiency.The industrial boundaries of both are also changing. As the demand for AI computing power grows, some Bitcoin mining companies are beginning to shift their existing electricity resources and data center facilities towards AI and high-performance computing businesses, hoping to transition from pure mining to computing infrastructure services. Some mining companies are leveraging previously allocated electricity capacity for mining to enter the AI data center market. However, transformation does not mean that cost pressures disappear: mining operations are more directly exposed to fluctuations in electricity prices and Bitcoin prices, while AI computing businesses must bear risks related to GPU procurement, depreciation, and underutilization. Both types of businesses compete for electricity and computing resources, but ultimately, profitability depends on how these resources are converted into revenue.

first_img The funding gap for Bitcoin mining companies is about 50 billion USD, and the borrowing costs for IREN and others are diverging

According to the Miner Weekly briefing published by BlocksBridge Consulting, Bitcoin mining companies expanding into the fields of artificial intelligence and high-performance computing are facing significantly different borrowing costs, with lenders increasingly scrutinizing large data center projects. The briefing points out that securing large AI clients is only part of the challenge; mining companies also need to raise billions of dollars to purchase computing power equipment, build data centers, and ensure the power infrastructure required for contract fulfillment. BlocksBridge indicates that large lending institutions have become more selective about data center loans, with decisions increasingly depending on client qualifications, contract terms, and project completion paths.The transition from Bitcoin mining to AI infrastructure by IREN reflects the differences in financing costs: the company secured $3.65 billion in GPU financing in June at a blended interest rate of 6%; in August, it completed another $2.4 billion financing with a fixed interest rate of 9%. The two agreements correspond to different projects and are not directly comparable, but they show that even within the same company, borrowing costs can vary significantly. Financing arrangements may also incur costs beyond interest; in another transaction involving Cipher Digital, Google guaranteed a $1.4 billion lease obligation in exchange for warrants representing a 5.4% equity stake in Cipher, with exercising the warrants potentially diluting existing shareholder equity.The rise in financing demand highlights the overall challenges mining companies face in entering the AI market. Data from VanEck shows that during the peak of the Bitcoin bull market in October last year, mining company debt surged by approximately 500% compared to the second quarter of 2024.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.