bip

According to SolanaFloor, the Solana ecosystem perpetual contract platform Bulk has launched BIP-1, allowing anyone to deploy their own perpetual market on the mainnet with almost zero upfront costs before going live.Successful markets can subsequently join BULK's portfolio margin system, allowing traders to use up to 70% less collateral.

The Bitcoin BIP-110 mandatory signaling window will open at block 961632, expected around August 9, 2026. As of the on-chain height of 959842, there are about 1790 blocks remaining until that block, and the support rate for BIP-110 signaling is approximately 2.64%.BIP-110's formal name is Reduced Data Temporary Softfork, which proposes to limit the size of certain data fields in Bitcoin transactions, mainly targeting Ordinals type inscriptions, large OP_RETURN payloads, and similar high data volume uses. If activated, the restrictions will take effect at block 965664 and will automatically expire after 52416 blocks, approximately one year later.Current signaling support mainly comes from Ocean, independent miners, and small operators, while major mining pools such as Foundry, Antpool, ViaBTC, and F2pool have not yet shifted to support it. Foundry has requested clients to vote based on average hash power; only if "support" votes exceed 51% of the participating weighted hash power will the pool switch all blocks to support signaling. If the current signaling level persists until block 961632, nodes executing BIP-110 will reject blocks that do not emit version bit 4 signals and will follow the minority of blocks that do emit signals. Non-upgraded nodes will continue to accept both signaling and non-signaling blocks and will follow the chain with the highest accumulated proof of work.

Renowned analyst PlanB expressed opposition to the Bitcoin BIP-110 proposal, believing that those supporting the fork do not truly understand the decentralized nature of Bitcoin.The proposal aims to temporarily limit non-payment data on-chain through a soft fork, with the current miner support rate at approximately 1%.

According to The Bitcoin Historian (@pete_rizzo_), White House officials recently stated that negotiations on the crypto clarity bill are progressing positively. The consistent strategy of the Democrats is not to express their stance in advance, but they often reach an agreement at critical moments.The official stated that "we are very close to passing it," and bipartisan support is continuing to grow.

According to market news, the U.S. Congress is engaged in bipartisan discussions on ethical issues. Negotiators are also discussing DeFi provisions, but ethical issues remain the main obstacle.When asked about the ethical proposal, Sen Lummis's spokesperson stated that the dialogue with the White House last week "went smoothly," and the ethical text to be released in the coming days will reflect this productive conversation.

Founder of Strategy, Michael Saylor, tweeted that attempting to modify Bitcoin rules simply because one does not agree with how others use Bitcoin is a nationalist impulse, which is contrary to the freedom, property rights, free market, and Austrian economics spirit upheld by the Bitcoin community.He bluntly stated that BIP 110 essentially enforces "monetary purity" through statutory means, which does not align with the core principle of Bitcoin's decentralization.

Michael Saylor posted on the X platform that many Bitcoin supporters he respects back the BIP 110 proposal. He understands and agrees with these individuals' desire to protect Bitcoin, but believes that the solutions proposed by this proposal are "more dangerous than the problem itself." Bitcoin needs guardians to maintain network neutrality, and he stated that he will present "110 reasons" explaining why Bitcoin must adhere to the principle of neutrality. Protecting Bitcoin is crucial in maintaining its fundamental attributes as a global open, decentralized currency network, rather than resolving short-term disputes in ways that may undermine network consensus.

Founder of Strategy Michael Saylor published a post opposing the BIP 110 proposal that restricts the use of inscriptions and other data storage purposes. Bitcoin should adhere to neutrality, open markets, and permissionless innovation, and should not target specific uses through consensus rules.Saylor listed 110 reasons for opposition, emphasizing that Bitcoin should remain conservative at its core. Bitcoin does not need guardians of purity; it needs guardians of neutrality.

Bitcoin News posted on the X platform that Dathon Pwn claims to have discovered a BIP 110 late upgrade consensus vulnerability, which may allow nodes upgrading from old software to retain chain history, while newly deployed BIP 110 nodes would reject this history, potentially leading to a hidden chain split.

According to CoinDesk, Runestone co-founder Leonidas announced that it is launching an open-source Bitcoin client called DOG Mode, aimed at bypassing BIP 110's restrictions on non-financial data. DOG Mode will increase the maximum weight unit for standard transactions from 400,000 to 3,900,000, close to the entire block capacity, and will reduce the dust limit from 294 to 546 satoshis down to 1 satoshi. Leonidas stated that removing the dust limit will free up approximately $25 million in idle funds.The BIP 110 proposal restricts arbitrary data through user-activated soft forks, requiring 55% miner support, which is currently close to zero. DOG Mode does not require any consensus or voting; it only needs to change the forwarding rules of a single node. If enough nodes run and miners accept, transactions can be confirmed. Leonidas mentioned that DOG Mode deviates from Core to a much lesser extent than Knots, and there is currently no code repository or version. He calls on developers to contribute code and miners to add support. The price of DOG tokens has dropped 1.2% in the last 24 hours.

The Bitcoin mining pool OCEAN announced on platform X that the backend of OCEAN will be upgraded to independently follow multiple chains in the event of a BIP 110 chain fork.If a fork occurs, DATUM miners will automatically continue to operate on the chain executed by their nodes, and OCEAN will record the rewards of that chain in the fork share log based on the ongoing operation and service terms of that chain. OCEAN will effectively operate as two mining pools from the fork point, and the updated service terms will be published before block 961,632.

The Bitcoin BIP-110 proposal is approaching its deadline in early August, with current miner support below 1% and the current cycle at 0, with no major mining pools supporting it. BIP-110, which stands for "Reducing Data Temporary Soft Fork," plans to limit OP_RETURN data capacity within a year, prohibiting most arbitrary data writes exceeding 256 bytes and restricting certain script formats primarily used for data storage. Strategy founder Michael Saylor and Blockstream co-founder Adam Back have both publicly opposed BIP-110.Data shows that BIP-110 adopts a user-activated soft fork mechanism, setting a 55% miner signal threshold, with the proportion of nodes running BIP-110 software in single digits, mainly from Bitcoin Knots users. The current signaling cycle for this proposal will end around block height 959,615, expected to enter a voluntary lock-up period in early August, with plans to activate around September. If widespread support is still lacking by then, it may lead to a minority of nodes forming a separate chain.

Blockstream co-founder Adam Back commented on the controversy within the Bitcoin community regarding BIP 110, stating that he understands and sympathizes with the concerns of those supporting BIP 110, who hate spam transactions and want to protect the network. However, the proposal is essentially an act of "trying to monitor others," which would erode Bitcoin's decentralization, security, and neutrality, fundamentally conflicting with the spirit of Bitcoin.In response, Michael Saylor retweeted and stated, "There are 110 things more dangerous to Bitcoin than spam. BIP 110 turns the spam controversy into a consensus change, which will invalidate some currently valid transactions that have paid fees. This precedent is the real danger, and we should focus our energy on the truly important threats."Previously, David Bailey, chairman of the Bitcoin Treasury Company Nakamoto and chairman of Bitcoin Magazine, stated that the failure of the so-called "BIP-110" long-standing controversy constitutes an "extreme benefit" for Bitcoin and believes this further validates the network's resistance to attacks and splits.

David Bailey, Chairman and CEO of the Nasdaq-listed Bitcoin treasury company Nakamoto, stated that the failure of the so-called "BIP-110" long-standing controversial event constitutes an "extreme benefit" for Bitcoin and believes it further validates the network's resistance to attacks and splits.This event is seen as a prolonged "governance layer conflict attempt" involving multiple games such as mining pool competition, client fork proposals, UASF (User Activated Soft Fork) mobilization, node consensus manipulation controversies, and large-scale information warfare surrounding social media and the developer community.David Bailey noted that this process validates the core characteristics of Bitcoin's governance structure: the final consensus is formed collectively by users, miners, developers, and industry participants, rather than being dominated by a single group. Historical similar events (such as BIP148) have proven that miners find it difficult to deviate from consensus, and this event further reinforces that conclusion, demonstrating the Bitcoin network's robust resistance to splits.

According to BBX data, last weekend Japan's largest financial group completed the most important cryptocurrency acquisition, and U.S. bipartisan senators launched a new regulatory offensive against prediction market platforms. The core developments are as follows:SBI Holdings, Inc. (Tokyo Stock Exchange: 8473) announced the acquisition of the Japanese cryptocurrency exchange Bitbank (privately held) for approximately $289 million. After the transaction is completed, SBI's cryptocurrency business will surpass all competitors, creating Japan's largest cryptocurrency exchange. SBI Holdings is one of Japan's largest independent financial services groups, already owning cryptocurrency-friendly network bank SBI Shinsei Bank, cryptocurrency asset custodian SBI Digital Asset Holdings, and multiple Bitcoin mining and cryptocurrency venture capital investments. Bitbank is one of Japan's largest spot BTC exchanges and holds an official cryptocurrency exchange license from the Financial Services Agency (FSA) of Japan. This acquisition marks a shift for traditional Japanese financial institutions from "strategic trial" in the cryptocurrency sector to "scale acquisition dominance," alongside the joint stablecoin plan of the three major banks: Mitsubishi UFJ ($MUFG), Sumitomo Mitsui ($SMFG), and Mizuho ($MFG) (targeting March 2027), forming the most intensive wave of cryptocurrency layout in Japan's financial industry by 2026.U.S. Senators John Curtis (Republican, Utah) and Adam Schiff (Democrat, California) reported on June 28 that they jointly sent a letter to the CFTC, urging it to conduct a formal investigation into the prediction market platform Polymarket (privately held), citing a "concerning" investigative report regarding Polymarket's "deceptive marketing" practices, which accused it of systematic misleading in user acquisition and risk disclosure. This is the third regulatory offensive against prediction market platforms initiated by Congress this year (previously, the House Oversight Committee launched an insider trading investigation on May 22); the two senators come from different parties, which is significant. For Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: $HOOD), this investigation poses indirect pressure—Robinhood's prediction market/event contract business (which achieved a record daily trading volume in June) faces the same regulatory qualitative disputes as Polymarket; however, Robinhood's defensive advantage lies in its ongoing application for a CFTC Designated Contract Market (DCM) license, providing a clearer compliance path compared to Polymarket.

According to The Block, a bipartisan group of lawmakers led by U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis has written to the Treasury Department, requesting the maintenance of states' authority to regulate stablecoins under the GENIUS Act. The act allows stablecoin issuers with a market capitalization of no more than $10 billion to be regulated by states, provided that state-level rules are "substantially similar" to federal rules. The Treasury Department released proposed rules in April, suggesting broad principles for determining whether state systems are "substantially similar," but did not clarify the timeline and standards for state regulation. The senators stated in their letter that the lack of clarity "creates uncertainty for the states," and therefore requested the Treasury Department to issue guidance that clarifies the application, review, and certification processes for state systems. The New York State Department of Financial Services proposed formal rules last week to align its stablecoin framework with the GENIUS Act.

A bipartisan group of senators led by Cynthia Lummis has written to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, requesting that the Treasury maintain states' regulatory authority over certain stablecoin issuers when formulating implementation rules for the GENIUS stablecoin bill. The GENIUS Act was signed into law last year, establishing a federal regulatory framework for stablecoins in the United States, requiring that stablecoins be fully backed by U.S. dollars or similar high-liquidity assets, and mandating that issuers with a market capitalization exceeding $50 billion undergo annual audits, while also setting rules for offshore issuance.The bill allows stablecoin issuers with a market capitalization of no more than $10 billion to be regulated at the state level, as long as the relevant state regulatory systems are "substantially similar" to federal requirements. The senators believe that the rules previously proposed by the Treasury do not clearly outline the timeline and standards for state regulatory system applications, reviews, and certifications, creating uncertainty for the states. The letter points out that there are significant differences in legislative cycles across states, with some states even adopting a biennial legislative cycle, thus requiring a flexible and continuously open certification mechanism to ensure that states can apply for certification when demand arises, rather than being constrained by timing mismatches that limit innovation and competition.

According to CoinDesk, bipartisan members of the U.S. House of Representatives introduced a bill on Thursday to establish a federal cryptocurrency theft task force led by the Attorney General, aimed at coordinating and leading investigations into cryptocurrency theft, fraud, and hacking.The bill was jointly initiated by Republican member Lance Gooden of the House Judiciary Committee and Democratic member Josh Gottheimer of the House Financial Services Committee.The task force will encompass multiple federal agencies, including the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of the Treasury, aiming to address the $11 billion theft and fraud issues caused last year and provide a unified federal response mechanism for victims.

Jason Smith, the chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives' fundraising committee, stated that digital asset tax legislation must receive bipartisan support; otherwise, the related bill process will not advance. Subsequently, U.S. Representatives Steven Horsford, Max Miller, Suzan DelBene, and Mike Carey jointly proposed the "Digital Asset Protection, Accountability, Regulation, Innovation, Taxation, and Revenue Act" (PARITY Act). The bill aims to update digital asset tax rules, provide a clearer regulatory framework for the market, while enhancing investor protection and preventing market manipulation.Representative Steven Horsford stated that the bill will help ordinary investors participate more safely in the digital asset market and promote wealth accumulation opportunities. Max Miller believes that the current U.S. tax laws are unable to adapt to the rapid development of digital assets and modern financial technology. Currently, the PARITY Act and the advancing CLARITY Act are seen as important components of establishing a comprehensive regulatory system for crypto assets in the United States.The U.S. Congress released a tax policy discussion draft in March this year and held a bipartisan roundtable in May to discuss the tax framework for crypto assets. The market is closely watching whether the CLARITY Act can be passed by 2026. Analysts believe that if both the CLARITY Act and the PARITY Act are ultimately legislated and combined with the subsequent rule-making of the GENIUS Act, the U.S. crypto industry will welcome a clearer regulatory environment, further promoting Web3 and DeFi into the mainstream financial system.